Clothing
as Status:
Decorating a Medieval Islamic Tunic
By Sayeda
Samee’nah al-Zahra bint Ayyub
“Clothes were the
extreme expression of status and wealth in the Islamic world” (Rogers 31). This paper will share some of the design
elements that went into these status fabrics. It is not comprehensive and
doesn't focus on any one Islamic culture in particular. I have tried to
synthesize elements that were more generic to the Islamic world and highlight
decorative elements from particular cultures that may be useful for re-enactors
who have concepts of European decoration, but are uncertain where to begin once
they step out of Christian cultures.
The basic
item of dress is the tunic. Tunics were worn in Roman holdings until about 1000
AD and were adopted by the Egyptians (Erikson 67) and
other Islamic groups. Early tunics were natural colored linen, but later
garments were made entirely from wool, in many colors. For the most part these
garments were woven in one piece with straight arms and no flair at the hem.
Some were made with the sleeves and chest piece of one cloth, and the front and
back “skirt” pieces sewn on (Erikson 67). Neck
openings were formed during weaving and may be a short slit down the front or
along the left shoulder. One fragment appears to have a placket on an opening,
but it is unclear where the opening would have fallen on the garment. (See
image 1) Some of the “straight woven sleeves were made narrower by stitching” (Erikson 67), though the type of stitching used has not been
indicted so far in my research. On some tunics the armscye
is left open (as one might do to set in an underarm gusset).Necklines were often
trimmed with ornamental fabric. Additionally, trim can be found around hems,
vents and around the underarm opening as can be seen in Image 2.
On several Egyptian
tunics a large tuck is taken at the waistline on both children's and adult
garments. It apparently did not serve as a belt casing or pocket since it is
entirely enclose, lying in a position where it would be belted over (Erikson 68). On children's clothes this could have been
explained as growth tuck. As to the adults garments, other

research has
indicated that tunics were not gender specific as they were woven, so men might
have used the tucks to shorten some garments, while women's were mostly left
long.
Heads are almost
never seen uncovered in medieval Islamic cultures. Men would wear caps, and
often have turbans on over them. Women covered their hair with scarves in a
variety of lengths ranging from just covering the hair, all the way to wraps,
resembling a Roman palla and reaching to the floor.
All of these head-coverings could come in a variety of colors.
Medieval Islamic
etiquette dictated that careful attention should be paid when selecting the
clothing for the day, watching for the combination “of specific brands of
silks, linens and cottons”(Baker 17) and taking care
that colors and textures “harmonize” (Leix 1582)
without being to bright or loud. Still, color was important and specific for
the Islamic public, with records showing specific desired shades as “pistachio
green” and “Egyptian onion purple” (Baker 41).
Many different
fabrics were available to Islamic peoples, with specific types becoming more
available as Islam spread and trade increased. Linen appears to be by far the
most common of the existing garments, though most of the textile finds we have
come from Egypt, which may or may not skew the data. Wool was considered by the
greater Islamic world to be the cloth of “simplicity, honesty and piety,”
suitable for religious officials and good rulers (Baker 21). It was both felted
and woven to make garments. Angora is introduced into Egypt and blended with
other wool by the 7th century and Erikson suggests
that it may have been introduced with Persian rule (619-626 AD) (Erikson 40). By the 9th century short-staple cotton was
being cultivated in Egypt, and by the 13th century the cotton industry was
growing aggressively (Erikson 40). In the Gulf area,
cotton was being produced and exported to China by the 6th century and followed the spread
of Islam into Sicily and Spain (Baker 23).
It is argued that silk weaving spread with the Islamic conquests,
although Erikson suggests that the Muslims were
prohibited from wearing silk robes. Perhaps much of it was exported as “other
groups were more liberal and could at least tolerate that the warp was of silk”
(Erikson 41). Some of these blended fiber fabrics,
called mulham, “Were among the most delicate to be
made in the 10th century” but their decoration “was restricted to a line
of Kufic text and the surface was glazed which made
it almost as lustrous as pure silk”(Erikson 41). Other resources indicate that, despite any
prohibitions, silk was a hot commodity.
A study of documents of medieval Islamic merchants shows twelve
different kinds of silks, four types of striped fabric, and decorations like
circles and spots looking like gold coins and animal eyes were apparently
extremely popular (Goitien, as referenced in Baker
40). Collecting garments and textiles seemed to be a like a game for the
medieval Islamic consumer. During the 10th century people would brag to
each other about what new fabrics were acquired and describe them in detailed
writings (Baker 41). Many scholars indicate that fabrics were used to pay taxes
and tribute during the medieval period.
Most scholars of
Islamic textiles recognize the difficulty of dyeing linen. Rogers indicates
that the Egyptians picked up from Greeks the practice of weaving in stripes of
brightly dyed wool with their linen garments. In Coptic Egypt this evolved into
highly decorated tunics, with roundels, stripes and squares as illustrated in
Image 3 (Rogers 5). Many of these decorative elements can be found in Arab
Egyptian garments as well. (See Image 4)
Beyond Coptic Egypt,
solid colored garments in a rainbow of hues were worn throughout the Islamic
world. (See Image 5) Garments could be patterned, striped and even the
occasional low-key plaid appears (as in Image 1). Both men and women's garments
are occasionally lined in a contrasting or complimentary fabric, and both sexes
wore trim at the hem.
White is said to be
the “most fitting” color for Islamic men. It is associated with purity and
loyalty. It is also the color one is buried in, (except for the man who dies in
battle– he can be buried dressed the way he died) (Baker 17). Red has quite the
history according to Baker, being linked to Mars in greater medieval Islam, and
was required wear for prostitutes in Mamluk Egypt.
The colors yellow, blue, red, and black were each designated for non-Muslims
while outdoors at different times in the Islamic world (Baker 17). During the
eight century, yellow was said to be worn by those leading a hedonistic
lifestyle (Baker 17). 7th century Sassanid Persians
were said to enjoy a range of deep blues, greens, and a variety of reds and
purples (Varron 366).
Resist dyed fabrics,
often called batik, have been found in Egypt from the 6th and 10th centuries, though not in
abundance (Baker 31). More commonly found patterned textiles are ikat fabrics (found in medieval Yemen, Central Asia, Syria,
and Turkey) (Baker 32). Ikat is produced by dyeing
the tightly wrapped, unwoven (usually warp) threads and then carefully weaving
them to achieve the desired look.
Embroidery and Tiraz
Embroidery can be
found in copious amounts throughout Islam. Cheaper than patterned fabrics, it
also could produce more complex and varied designs (Baker 32). Writing was
extremely important to the Islam person, as we find large numbers of garments
embroidered with text. These could be worshipful,
asking for blessing or protections, or pseudo-script filled with meaningless
letters (it is suggested that pseudo-script found on later tiraz
is a result of privatization and relaxed official control (Rogers 32). One
personal inscription from a 10th- 11th century tunic read “This
garments is made for a beloved woman”(Erikson 64). Large numbers of garments can be found with
text on them making whole patterns. These inscriptions often follow a formula.
Beginning with the basmal, or confessions (“In the name of Allah, the Merciful, the
Compassionate...”) and then, as Erikson states, “the
name of the Caliph, his title, a blessing to him, sometimes the name of the
vizier, the manufacturer, the town and finally the year.” (Erikson
64) Kufic
style text is the most commonly found, probably because it's
blocky style lends itself more easily to application on fabric. Rogers believes
that this style of script is an attempt to lend to writing the same rhythmic
form found in the spoken Koran (Rogers 32).

The word tiraz had different meanings through the period. Erikson explains, “Royal or private and State or public
[textile] production centers were known as tiraz--
workshops-- and were established all over the Arab world from China to Spain.
The word tiraz is, in fact, Persian for
embroidery. It also came to mean the garment itself, decorated with
embroideries and worn by distinguished persons. Finally, it became the name of
the workshop and fabric-- often a delicate linen cloth with decorative bands of
silk and gold– which were made there”(Erikson
53). For the purposes of this paper, the
word refers to the latter.
People serving the
Caliphate as officers were given an item from these workshops every year that
they served (Erikson 53). When included on garments tiraz bands could be worn at the mid-biceps and did
not always wrap around the whole arm, often ending about where they would be
hidden underneath the arms when kept at one's sides. Other placements include
the hem. On many turbans a small gold
square can be seen in the wrappings that resembles a tiraz
piece (see Image 5). It should be noted that garments are not the only items
decorated with tiraz as “domestic” textiles
have been found with similar decoration (Rogers 31).

One interesting
embroidered piece is the mandil, or kerchief. They
appeared to be an important accessory to the medieval Arab man as they were
carefully selected to coordinate with each outfit. Usually carried or worn in
the belt, this little piece could cost as much as an entire garment! They would
be dyed in a rainbow of colors, sometimes decorated with fringe, gold
embroidery or painted inscriptions. Inscriptions could include a short story of
its destiny or fate (Baker 41).
Stitches used to
embroider tiraz have been recorded as the
spilt-stem-stitch on early examples and under the Abbasid rule included
chain-stitch with blanket and back-stitch used for minor details (Baker 57,
60). During Fatimid rule, depiction of animals
(including birds, dogs and rabbits) began showing up and uniting with “floral Kufic epigrams” (Erikson
65). But under the reign of the Ayyubids (1171-1254) this practice was suppressed. Erikson notes that "the Fatimids
were Shi'a Muslims and allowed images, as opposed to
the [Ayyubids who were] Sunnites [and] did not"
allow them (Erikson 65). Geometric embroideries are
then found in greater numbers.
Interestingly, the
Koran does not actually prohibit images, only idolism. "However, in the hidith –
stories about the traditions and resurrection of the Prophet –
the following is written: ‘Those who copy living things shall be answerable for
their actions on the Day of Judgment and shall be punished’.” (Erikson 65) According to Baker, the idea is that such
depictions are attempting to “imitate the Creator in His work” (Baker 16).
Baker,
Patricia L. Islamic Textiles. London: British Museum Press, 1995.
Erikson, Marianne. Textiles in Egypt 200-1500 A.D. in Swedish Museum Collections. Goteborg: Graphic Systems AB, 1997.
Leix, Alfred. "Early Oriental
Textiles" from Ciba Review 45, May 1942.
Lewis, Suzanne. Early Coptic
Textiles: Stanford Art Gallery, Stanford University, May 4 to May 25, 1969.
Stanford Art Book 9. Stanford: Department of Art,
Stanford University, 1969.
Rogers, Clive. Early Islamic Textiles. Brighton: Rogers & Podmore, 1983.
Varron, A. "The Early History of
Silk". Ciba Review 11, July 1938.
Image 1:
Rogers, Clive. Early Islamic Textiles. (Brighton:
Rogers & Podmore, 1983) p 41.
Image 2:
Rogers, Clive. Early Islamic Textiles. (Brighton:
Rogers & Podmore, 1983) p10.
Image 3:
Lewis, Suzanne. Early Coptic
Textiles: Stanford Art Gallery, Stanford University, May 4 to May 25, 1969.
Stanford Art Book 9. (Stanford:
Department of Art, Stanford University, 1969) p 9.
Image 4:
Baker,
Patricia L. Islamic Textiles. (London: British Museum Press, 1995),
p 37.
Image 5:
Baker,
Patricia L. Islamic Textiles. (London: British Museum Press, 1995),
p 51.
Sayeda Samee'nah al-Zahra bint
Ayyub is an 11th century Islamic woman living with
her family in the city of Codorba, Spain (al-Andalus). As a literate woman she enjoys reading poetry
with her family when she gets a break from her daily tasks
Julia Spiritstone is a soon-to-be graduate living in Fargo, ND.
She enjoys sharing with her friends a passion for both textiles and history and
loves the forum the SCA provides for combining all of these things. She is
currently serving as the Chatelaine for the Shire of Korsvag.